孙倩
I.Introduction
Inaworldofever-increasingtransnationalinteraction,theimportanceofindividualprotectionduringtheprocessesconcurrentlyincreases.Nationalityistheprincipallinkbetweenindividualsandstatesbutalsoisthebridgeconnectingindividualswithinternationallaw.Itisjustthroughthelinkageofnationalitycanapersonenjoydiplomaticprotectionbyhisparentstate.Butduetodoublenationality,therearelotsofdifficultiestoeffectivediplomaticprotectionofindividuals.Theprincipleofeffectivenationalitywasformedthroughthejudicialpracticeofinternationalcourtofjustice.Whatisthemeaningoftheprincipleofeffectivenationality?Isitaperfecttheoryinthefaceofdiplomaticprotectionofdualnational?Inthisarticle,theauthorwillintroducetheconceptofthisprincipleandgiveheropinionsonit.
II:Theconceptofprincipleofeffectivenationality
Nationalityofanindividualishisqualityofbeingasubjectofacertainstate.Nationalityisofcriticalimportancetoindividuals,especiallywithregardtoindividualsabroadortheirproperty.Firstly,itisthemainlinkbetweenindividualandastate.Itisevidencethatonecanbeprotectedbyhisparentstate.
Secondly,tosomeextent,individualsarenotthesubjectsofinternationallaw,sotheycannotdirectlyenjoytherightsandundertakeresponsibilitiescomingfrominternationallaw.Itisthroughthemediumoftheirnationalitythatindividualscannormallyenjoybenefitsfrominternationallaw.
Inprinciple,nationalityasatermoflocalormunicipallawisusuallydeterminedbythelawofparticularstate.Eachstatehasdiscretionofdeterminingwhoisandwhoisnot,tobeconsidereditsnationals.However,thereisnogenerallybindingrulesconcerningacquisitionandlossofnationality,andasthelawsofdifferentstatesdifferinmanypointsrelatingtothismatter,soitisbeyondsurprisingthatanindividualmayprocessmorethanonenationalityaseasilyasnoneatall.Butwhethereachgrantednationalityownedbythesedualnationalshasinternationaleffectsisindoubt.Inanotherword,thedeterminationbyeachstateofthegrantofitsownnationalityisnotnecessarilytobeacceptedinternationallywithoutquestion.Especially,whenadualnationalseeksdiplomaticprotectioninsomethirdstate,thatstateisnotanswerabletobothofstatesofhisnationalitybutonlyoneofthem.Inthissituation,thethirdstateisentitledtojudgewhichnationalityshouldberecognized.
AsstatedinArt1oftheHagueConventionof1930oncertainquestionsrelatingtotheconflictofnationalitylaws,whileitisforeachstatetodetermineunderitsownlawwhoareitsnationals,suchlawmustberecognizedbyotherstatesonly“insofarasitisconsistentwithinternationalconventions,internationalcustom,andtheprincipleoflawgenerallyrecognizedwithregardtonationality”.Inthe“Nottebohm”case,theInternationalCourtofJusticeregardnationalityas:‘alegalbondhavingasitsbasisasocialfactofattachment,agenuineconnectionofexistenceandsentiments,togetherwiththeexistenceofreciprocalrightsandduties.Itmaybeuponwhomitisconferred,eitherdirectlybythelaworasaresultofanactoftheauthorities,isinfactmorecloselyconnectedwiththepopulationofthestateconferringnationalitythanwiththatofanyotherstate’Thatiswhatiscalledtherealandeffectivenationality.Derivingfromthecourt’sopinion,theprincipleofeffectivenationalitycameintobeing.Theessentialpartsofeffectiveandrealnationalityarethatwhichaccordedwiththefacts,whichbasedonstrongerfactualtiesbetweenthepersonconcernedandoneofthestateswhosenationalityisinvolved.Differentfactorsaretakenintoconsideration,andtheirimportancewillvaryfromonecasetothenext:thehabitualresidenceoftheindividualconcernedisanimportantfactor,butthereareotherfactorssuchasthecentreofhisinterests,hisfamilies,hisparticipationinpubliclife,attachmentshownbyhimforagivencountryandinculcatedinhischildren,etc.Accordingtothisprinciple,nostateisunderobligationtorecognizeanationalitygrantednotmeetingtherequirementsofit.IntheNottebohmcase,InternationalCourtofJusticefirstenunciatedthisprincipleanddeniedLiechtensteintherighttoprotectNottebohm.
III.Nottebohmcaseandreviewsontheprincipleofeffectivenationality
IntheNottebohmcase,involvingLiechtensteinandGuatemala,theformersoughtrestitutionandcompensationonbehalfofNottebohmforthelatter’sactionsallegedlyinviolationofinternationallaw.
Nottebohm,aGermannationalresidentinGuatemala,hadlargebusinessinterestthereandinGermany.HealsohadabrotherinLiechtenstein,whomheoccasionallyvisited.WhilestillaGermannational,NottebohmappliedfornaturalizationinLiechtensteinonOctober9,1939,shortlyaftertheGermaninvasionofPoland.Relievedofthethree-yearresidencerequirements,NottebohmpaidhisfeesandtaxestoLiechtensteinandbecameanaturalizedcitizenofLiechtensteinbytakinganoathofallegianceonOctober20,1939,therebyforfeitinghisGermannationalityunderthenationalitylawofLiechtenstein.HereturnedtoLiechtensteinearlyin1949onaLiechtensteinpassporttoresumehisbusinessactivities.Athisrequest,theGuatemalanministryofExternalAffairschangedtheNotteb
I.Introduction
Inaworldofever-increasingtransnationalinteraction,theimportanceofindividualprotectionduringtheprocessesconcurrentlyincreases.Nationalityistheprincipallinkbetweenindividualsandstatesbutalsoisthebridgeconnectingindividualswithinternationallaw.Itisjustthroughthelinkageofnationalitycanapersonenjoydiplomaticprotectionbyhisparentstate.Butduetodoublenationality,therearelotsofdifficultiestoeffectivediplomaticprotectionofindividuals.Theprincipleofeffectivenationalitywasformedthroughthejudicialpracticeofinternationalcourtofjustice.Whatisthemeaningoftheprincipleofeffectivenationality?Isitaperfecttheoryinthefaceofdiplomaticprotectionofdualnational?Inthisarticle,theauthorwillintroducetheconceptofthisprincipleandgiveheropinionsonit.
II:Theconceptofprincipleofeffectivenationality
Nationalityofanindividualishisqualityofbeingasubjectofacertainstate.Nationalityisofcriticalimportancetoindividuals,especiallywithregardtoindividualsabroadortheirproperty.Firstly,itisthemainlinkbetweenindividualandastate.Itisevidencethatonecanbeprotectedbyhisparentstate.
Secondly,tosomeextent,individualsarenotthesubjectsofinternationallaw,sotheycannotdirectlyenjoytherightsandundertakeresponsibilitiescomingfrominternationallaw.Itisthroughthemediumoftheirnationalitythatindividualscannormallyenjoybenefitsfrominternationallaw.
Inprinciple,nationalityasatermoflocalormunicipallawisusuallydeterminedbythelawofparticularstate.Eachstatehasdiscretionofdeterminingwhoisandwhoisnot,tobeconsidereditsnationals.However,thereisnogenerallybindingrulesconcerningacquisitionandlossofnationality,andasthelawsofdifferentstatesdifferinmanypointsrelatingtothismatter,soitisbeyondsurprisingthatanindividualmayprocessmorethanonenationalityaseasilyasnoneatall.Butwhethereachgrantednationalityownedbythesedualnationalshasinternationaleffectsisindoubt.Inanotherword,thedeterminationbyeachstateofthegrantofitsownnationalityisnotnecessarilytobeacceptedinternationallywithoutquestion.Especially,whenadualnationalseeksdiplomaticprotectioninsomethirdstate,thatstateisnotanswerabletobothofstatesofhisnationalitybutonlyoneofthem.Inthissituation,thethirdstateisentitledtojudgewhichnationalityshouldberecognized.
AsstatedinArt1oftheHagueConventionof1930oncertainquestionsrelatingtotheconflictofnationalitylaws,whileitisforeachstatetodetermineunderitsownlawwhoareitsnationals,suchlawmustberecognizedbyotherstatesonly“insofarasitisconsistentwithinternationalconventions,internationalcustom,andtheprincipleoflawgenerallyrecognizedwithregardtonationality”.Inthe“Nottebohm”case,theInternationalCourtofJusticeregardnationalityas:‘alegalbondhavingasitsbasisasocialfactofattachment,agenuineconnectionofexistenceandsentiments,togetherwiththeexistenceofreciprocalrightsandduties.Itmaybeuponwhomitisconferred,eitherdirectlybythelaworasaresultofanactoftheauthorities,isinfactmorecloselyconnectedwiththepopulationofthestateconferringnationalitythanwiththatofanyotherstate’Thatiswhatiscalledtherealandeffectivenationality.Derivingfromthecourt’sopinion,theprincipleofeffectivenationalitycameintobeing.Theessentialpartsofeffectiveandrealnationalityarethatwhichaccordedwiththefacts,whichbasedonstrongerfactualtiesbetweenthepersonconcernedandoneofthestateswhosenationalityisinvolved.Differentfactorsaretakenintoconsideration,andtheirimportancewillvaryfromonecasetothenext:thehabitualresidenceoftheindividualconcernedisanimportantfactor,butthereareotherfactorssuchasthecentreofhisinterests,hisfamilies,hisparticipationinpubliclife,attachmentshownbyhimforagivencountryandinculcatedinhischildren,etc.Accordingtothisprinciple,nostateisunderobligationtorecognizeanationalitygrantednotmeetingtherequirementsofit.IntheNottebohmcase,InternationalCourtofJusticefirstenunciatedthisprincipleanddeniedLiechtensteintherighttoprotectNottebohm.
III.Nottebohmcaseandreviewsontheprincipleofeffectivenationality
IntheNottebohmcase,involvingLiechtensteinandGuatemala,theformersoughtrestitutionandcompensationonbehalfofNottebohmforthelatter’sactionsallegedlyinviolationofinternationallaw.
Nottebohm,aGermannationalresidentinGuatemala,hadlargebusinessinterestthereandinGermany.HealsohadabrotherinLiechtenstein,whomheoccasionallyvisited.WhilestillaGermannational,NottebohmappliedfornaturalizationinLiechtensteinonOctober9,1939,shortlyaftertheGermaninvasionofPoland.Relievedofthethree-yearresidencerequirements,NottebohmpaidhisfeesandtaxestoLiechtensteinandbecameanaturalizedcitizenofLiechtensteinbytakinganoathofallegianceonOctober20,1939,therebyforfeitinghisGermannationalityunderthenationalitylawofLiechtenstein.HereturnedtoLiechtensteinearlyin1949onaLiechtensteinpassporttoresumehisbusinessactivities.Athisrequest,theGuatemalanministryofExternalAffairschangedtheNotteb
本新闻共2页,当前在第1页 1 2
